The skinny on being fat: America's growing problem
By Joan Trossman Bien 06/04/2009
The alarm went out a few weeks ago: The FDA warned consumers to stop using 14 Hydroxycut weight loss products immediately. One death and 23 serious illnesses had been attributed to the largely unregulated products, which scientists now believe can cause jaundice and liver failure. Even more startling is the fact that they have not yet been able to identify which specific ingredients are causing the damage. It warned that other so-called weight loss supplements may also have those same ingredients.
Although most weight loss products are not considered particularly dangerous, experts say they are mostly a waste of your money. But people continue to buy the supplements, gadgets, and even undergo drastic surgical procedures in search of a quick fix for obesity.
The more we know, the dumber we get
Obesity in America is out of control and on a lot of people’s minds. If you Google the word “diet,” 160 million search results will pop up. Ads for bariatric surgery, which include the lap band procedure as well as gastric bypass, are so ubiquitous that those terms have become part of the American lexicon. It seems the more we know about weight control, the fatter we get as a society.
According to the Centers for Disease Control, two-thirds of the American adult population is now overweight or obese, as defined by a body mass index of more than 30 and more than 35. And close to one in five children are tipping the scales in the overweight category. The CDC ticked off the possible health consequences of being overweight: heart disease, type 2 diabetes, certain types of cancer, high blood pressure, stroke, liver and gall bladder disease, respiratory problems, osteoarthritis and gynecological problems. Yet we are eating more and exercising less than we did in the 1970s. What is going on?
The hard truth, intimately known to anyone who has tried to lose a significant amount of weight and keep it off, is that weight control is really hard. Everything in our physiology fights it. Experts say 95 percent of diets fail within a year. Others say the whole idea of going on a diet is a bad one. It doesn’t work the way it is supposed to work.
The odd history of dieting
People have been trying to alter their appearance to fit into the latest definition of beauty for a long, long time. And some of the ideas were downright dangerous or stupid. Yet, they were popular. For example, in Edwardian times, the chewing diet was all the rage. It required chewing each bite exactly 32 times, tipping back the head and letting the masticated mass trickle down the throat. Anything still too large to easily slide down was to be spit out. Dinnertime must have been quite entertaining for the skinny people.
The tapeworm diet was a hit around the turn of the century. Pills purported to contain those little critters were sold as a way to trim one’s waistline. The downside? First, there are the side effects of having a live worm inside your stomach, which can cause nausea, headaches, infections, and diarrhea. Even worse, the tapeworms can lay eggs which can block your organs, possibly resulting in death.
During modern times, we have not become much wiser. Elvis was a big fan of the Sleeping Beauty diet, the idea being that if you sedate yourself enough to sleep for days, you won’t be eating while you already sleeping. Variations of the ear stapling diet have surfaced in recent years, touting the somewhat nutty idea that piercing a specific spot on cartilage of your external ear will suppress your appetite. Yikes.
The cotton ball diet is just what is sounds like. If they couldn’t stomach plain old cotton balls, some people soaked them in gelatin first. No one seems to know the exact number of calories in a cotton ball, but some say they can be quite filling.
And eating enough of them will, obviously, bring on malnutrition and possibly the men in white jackets.
The blood type diet, which dictates which foods you should eat or avoid according to your blood clotting factors, is just silly. Some very popular diets reach back, way back, into history for dietary guidance. The hallelujah diet requires eating only food specifically mentioned in Genesis 1:29. In other words, it is a raw vegan diet that can bring on severe malnutrition. It also ignores Genesis 9:3, wherein God lifts those dietary restrictions.
Some of us may remember the grapefruit diet which, after 70 years, just won’t go away. It works because it is a low carb, high protein diet that can help you eliminate 10 pounds of water in 12 days. But once you eat normally again, the lost weight returns and there you are, never wanting to look at another grapefruit for as long as you live. In the 1960s, there was the drinking man’s diet, which drastically cut calories in order to allow for the evening martini. The 1970s saw the Beverly Hills diet, which claimed that if you ate as much as you wanted of only one recommended food all day long, such as a watermelon day or a grapes day, you would lose weight. Just don’t stray too far from home. The 1990s saw the juice fast diet, which claimed that the juice created in a very expensive juicer machine was nutritionally superior to the whole fruit or vegetable whence it came. The cabbage soup diet is self-explanatory. Obviously, you didn’t eat very many calories on that one.
Some of the recent fad diets make the claim that they will cleanse your body of residual bad stuff that is stuck in your colon. Evercleanse promises to remove from six to 40 pounds of waste stuck in your digestive tract. “If toxins and waste were really retained in the body,” FDA officer Vincent Cordero, M.D., said, “the human race would not have survived.”
Another outrageous claim was the Hollywood Detox Body Wrap. It promised to draw toxins out through the skin with the result of long-term weight loss of four to six inches, all in less than an hour.
Then there are the you-are-what-you-wear claims such as Skineez jeans, which, for $139, are imbued with a chemical that will pull the weight out of your legs just by wearing the jeans. In recent years, we saw Slimming Slippers and the Slimming Soles methods of weight reduction, as well as the Magic ear staple and the Ninzu ear clips.
Surgery is now respectable
There is a serious side to drastic weight loss. Bariatric surgery, which has been around for a long time, has refined its advertising. What had been a procedure of last resort for the morbidly obese, which means someone who is more than 100 pounds overweight, has become the shortcut du jour for extreme weight loss. The clinics that offer procedures such as the lap band technique sometimes act as cheerleaders for the results. The path to such surgery often begins at a seminar that is merely a sales tool. Yes, doctors are involved throughout the process and the preliminary preparation can take a few months, which includes a psychological evaluation. But once you are on that path, patients say it takes on a life of its own as the benefits are highlighted while the risks are minimized. The evidence of efficacy is often provided in the form of testimonials instead of being available as unbiased information.
Dr. Geoffrey Drew, M.D., runs a weight control practice in Thousand Oaks. He is a proponent of the high protein, low calorie regimen along with exercise and common sense. But when it comes to gastric surgery, he is less enthusiastic. “I recognize that at least 10 percent of the population now needs bariatric surgery as a matter of urgency,” Drew said. “In those cases, the only surgery I recommend is the lap band because that can be reversed when they have learned to eat properly.”
Drew added that even the lap band procedure can have serious and dangerous side effects. “After lap band surgery, the patients are so limited in their food choices that they have to think about food every hour,” Drew said. “After about six months, about 60 percent of them are iron-deficiency anemic.”
Although Drew said the procedure usually results in tremendous weight loss during the first year, “what we are worried about is the next year, when they start getting into nutritional deficiencies. So I see the lap band procedure as a temporary solution for most people.”
When good surgery leads to a bad life
Mildred (not her real name), 48, lives in Camarillo, and she has a lot to say about life after surgery. Mildred had the gastric bypass procedure, which is not reversible, performed three years ago. She said her life has been permanently altered and not really for the better, even though she has dropped 285 pounds.
“If you had the 285 pounds sitting on a table in front of me, and the gastric bypass surgery sitting in front of me,” Mildred said, “I would grab the 285 pounds and put it back on.”
Although it sounds as though Mildred’s surgery has been quite successful, she would differ with that conclusion. “I used to be able to tell you that I was a basically healthy person,” she said, “and now I am not a healthy person. At first, I was losing 30 to 50 pounds a month. I am not maintaining my weight; I still have not been able to stop losing weight.”
Mildred said she decided to have the surgery in order to be able to play with her grandchildren. But she did not foresee how seriously the surgery would affect her entire life. “If I eat the wrong things, I don’t have energy,” Mildred said. “I have to watch my blood levels because of anemia. My moods have changed drastically.”
What Mildred said she has learned is that she was in serious need of psychological therapy for compulsive overeating a lot more than she needed the bypass surgery. She is still in therapy and said she is making progress but it is going slowly.
“Even now, when I first glance in the mirror, I still see my heavy self and that is my eating disorder,” Mildred said. “I wish I would have gone into therapy first and not had the surgery. I didn’t know I had other options. I would not recommend the gastric bypass for anyone.”
Diet is a four letter word
Lois Zsarney is a marriage and family therapist as well as a registered dietician in Ventura. She said being extremely overweight is usually all about emotional eating. “Sometimes clients are using food as a coping mechanism,” Zsarney said.
“They use food when they are tired or lonely, upset, happy or sad. They eat in response to emotions rather than physical hunger.”
Zsarney said there are other reasons for gaining so much weight. “Some people use the weight as a psychological barrier to keep other people away from them,” she said. “If a woman feels vulnerable to attention from men, then they will be overweight and they won’t be bothered as much. It is like a physical boundary that they put up.”
Susan Richter is a certified easting disorder specialist as well as a marriage and family therapist in Camarillo. She agrees with Zsarney that the reasons for overeating have little to do with physical hunger. “A lot of people are eating to numb feelings,” she said. Even more complications can set in after bariatric surgery. “If someone is eating in order to become numb and is not able to use food in the way they did before, they are more vulnerable to try to numb themselves in other ways.” Specifically, by acquiring new addictions, such as alcohol or other compulsive behavior.
So why is losing weight and keeping it off so difficult? “The current information, even from many doctors, is to diet; yet we know that dieting doesn’t work,” Richter said. “Ninety-five percent of all diets end in failure; in fact, increased weight gain. Over time, when people go on repeated diets, they actually end up gaining more weight.”
Richter said the obsession with the scale is counterproductive. “When you say you need to lose the weight, the focus is very narrow, and it is all just about the numbers,” Richter said. “That, as opposed to you would like to feel better in your own body.”
As for clients who have had bariatric surgery and have failed to keep the weight off, Zsarney said there is a complicated emotional response. “It is a grief and loss process,” she said. “Grieving the loss of the ability to eat the way they used to eat that caused the weight gain.”
Zsarney said there is another aspect that comes into play. “It can also be about self-esteem,” she said. “If you think you’re a piece of crap, you’re going to treat yourself like a piece of crap.”
For some people, being overweight or obese does not present a problem. Jill (not her real name) is in her late 40s and lives in Simi Valley. After a progression of having four children, she just gave up trying to lose the weight that accumulated after her final two pregnancies. “I don’t have any health issues, and I don’t really care about it,” Jill said. “I don’t have any body image issues. It doesn’t bother me.”
Jill candidly acknowledged that she is seriously overweight but said that losing weight is less important to her than enjoying food. “I love food,” she said. “I love to shop for food. I love to cook food. I love to share food.” Jill said she would never even consider having bariatric surgery because she believes she will never succumb to the looming health issues that accompany obesity. “I don’t deny myself much in the way that I eat.”
DIGG | del.icio.us | REDDIT
Other Stories by Joan Trossman Bien
Related Articles
Comments
As a five year, post lap-band surgery patient who has succeeded in losing 250 pounds AND maintaining that weight loss with NO medical problems as a result of the surgery or the foods I choose to eat I believe this article was written by someone who failed miserably on doing her research, both with "patients" and bariatric surgeons. The article is ripe with incomplete and incorrect data and the person who put her name to having penned it should be ashamed of herself. This is sensational journalism in its worst form and could be used for a high school journalism class to teach how research and interviews should and should not be done.
Might I suggest interviewing successful patients (the largest majority) as well as a bariatric surgeon and using JAMA perhaps for reference as well as the bases for another artcile that would put forth the whole truth?
Are you in the dark ages. Yes most of us obese patients are emtional eaters. So what is wrong with having a surgical tool to help us lose weight with a good support team to teach us to learn new habits and get rid of the bad ones. It is just a tool but unlike many of the different food programs out there they are temporary then we stop and you go back to your old ways. You will always have the tool to rely on to help you. Yes all good programs mean low calories, high protein, exercise and vitiams
and yes you do have to pay attendtion but what is wrong with that. I am a 6 1/2 yr post op from Gastric bypass surgery and I am here to tell you that I would probably be in a wheelchair or dead at this point so the risk of having surgery was well worth it. I had Sleep Apena w/Cpap and oxegen, 2 meds for high blood pressure, med for diabetes, vioxx, nerontin, 2 inhalers, trazadone at night and prozac for the day. My highest weight was 395 and I am 5'4". I felt like a hamster running in circle going nowhere fast. It hurt to move and it hurt to not move with degenerate arthritis in my neck, bone spurs in both kneels and bone spurs in my lower back. At 50 yrs old I was on my way to a short life as both parents had simular problem and are both deceased I refused to go that way. It is not the easiest way out but I am happier and healthier now then I have ever been and have 11 grandchildren I can now play with and enjoy. the Cpap and all those meds I was on are all gone now due to the weight lost. Oh by the way if I have to pay attendtion to what I eat for the rest of my life to be healthy I am damn worth it.
I'm sorry, I thought reportage was supposed to have some objectivity to it. Was this really a misrepresented op-ed article?
You misrepresent a handful of individuals as speaking for all gastric surgery outcomes. They do not, and they certainly don't speak for me because my outcome is very different, but then I never was -- and still am not -- an emotional eater. I do not think of food all the time. In fact, I have quite frankly stopped having the cravings that people without surgery find their lives controlled by. It is not easy make a major life change, which is what obesity surgery represents, and my doctor has always been quite frank about the negative outcomes that some individuals have so that his patients, as they are required to be by law, are fully informed when they make their decision to have -- or not to have -- surgery. At all stages along the way, diet and psychological advice is proffered so that people can choose a different, less invasive, means of dealing with their problem. Your method of using one paint brush to paint everyone is just plain offensive and bad reportage.
I can see why a lot of the other comments are from people who are upset... I do agree with the assertion that, as a society, "the more we know, the dumber we get." Those commercials (for some sort of butter substitute) where it shows a family with giant sticks of butter in their food and says "we didn't know any better back then," crack me up... If we're so much smarter now, why is obesity such a problem now and it wasn't then? The conclusions reached in this article, though, namely that 1) obesity is a strictly emotional problem and 2) surgery is a dangerous and unsuccessful "shortcut du jour for extreme weight loss" are, as others have mentioned, inaccurate and only half the story. Moreover, you've reinforced the most sensational and misconceived half of the story.
I'm only a few months out from Gastric Bypass and yes with some serious complications but this was not from the surgery or anything I done. I have lost 80 lbs something I tried to do for years and I no longer have craving like I used to. My hig blood pressure is cured 94/68 and no longer need my sleep apnea machine. This is only 8 weeks post-op! My joints are feeling better and I can get around without so much chronic pain, able to enjoy my family activities ect. I have self esteem now. I wish when someone writes a article on bariatric surgery that they would interview a bariatric surgeon and several post-op patients to put the whole truth out there including positive healthy changes that take place with gastric bypass surgery. I was asked last week by my primary doc would I do this offer again and my answer was YES even with complications. This was and is the only tool that worked for me. Counseling, diets, ect did not work I needed the tool of surgery to get my health and life back.
The following statement is not true and I don't believe a knowledgeable doctor would make such a statement -
"After lap band surgery, the patients are so limited in their food choices that they have to think about food every hour,” Drew said. “After about six months, about 60 percent of them are iron-deficiency anemic.”
This statement must have been made out of ignorance, or intentional mis-representation.
I am 18 months out from lap band surgery. I followed none of the post op rules I was supposed to follow, attended not 1 support group meeting and still have lost 30 pounds. I never think about food. I am not limited in my food choices; I eat everything I used to eat, just in smaller quantities. I am not deficient in any nutrient, including iron. I simply cannot fit a glutinous large amount of food in my stomach in a short period of time any longer. I eat slowly, and I stop when full. If I don't stop when full it hurts and I feel sick, and may even throw up. It doesn't take long with such direct consequences that one learns to control behavior that before was uncontrollable. If I was able to do this without surgery I certainly would have, but THANK GOD there is such a thing for those of us who recognize that they need help and cannot choose, when left to their own resources, to eat the right amount or type of food, whatever the reason(s).
I cannot imagine your motivation for writing such an article. It appears that you are telling fat people they are weak and should just be smarter like the skinny people? Or are you saying that fat people should just resign and submit that this is how it will be and be OK with it? I was OK with my weight, I didn't feel badly about myself or how I looked, my husband still loved me, said I was beautiful, and wanted me all the time. I wasn't unhealthy (yet), I'm still young. I am also intelligent enough to know that, like smoking, it will get me eventually. Anyone who doesn't understand that has their head in the sand. I am intelligent and aware enough to know that I want to be around to meet my grandchildren and I have a much better chance of doing that at a healthier lower weight. I love my lap band. My weight loss has been steady and healthy. I do not regain weight I have lost. I do plateau at times, however I eventually keep losing and long term success is the real prize. I still love food, I still love shopping for it, cooking it, and eating it. I still love to eat in restaurants and I still do all of the above, just in smaller quantities.
My guess would be that you are struggling with your own weight loss and this article is a way of rationalizing and justifying inaction.
THIS IS CLEARLY NOT A FAIR AND UNBIAS NEWS SOURCE! I am deeply offended by your irresponsible journalism. I am 9 months out of having lap band surgery and it has changed my life 100% for the better. Your article fails to have any sort of balance, sounds more like a witch hunt than anything else. The author of this article needs to print a retraction to retain any kind of creditability. Joan Trossman Bien you should be ashamed to call yourself a journalist.
This article is unfortunately wrought with extraneous amounts of false information regarding bariatric surgery. I find your research and factual statements extremely short sided and frankly, incorrect. Please consider doing more empirical research before writing such an irresponsible article such as this. The fact that you failed to interview even ONE bariatric surgeon to get any facts straight is shameful. I hope you consider retracting the article and present a truly objective and factually based presentation next time.