RSH 3-22 Nuclear workers inspect schematics overlooking the Sodium Reactor Experiment  in the 1950s.

Rocketdyne still hot

Questionable new EPA soil survey detects radiation thousands of times over cleanup triggers

By Michael Collins 03/22/2012

More than half a century since several partial meltdowns at the former Rocketdyne complex in eastern Ventura County, astronomical amounts of radiation are still being unearthed at the site, according to a new U.S. Environmental Protection Agency PowerPoint dated Feb. 22.


The presentation shows current radiation readings at the now-demolished Sodium Reactor Experiment, or SRE, at levels thousands of times above background. Background means background radiation or the radiation one would expect to find “naturally” from cosmic rays, the sun and radiation in soil and rocks, like uranium, thorium, radium and potassium.


The SRE was the site of an uncontained partial meltdown in 1959 that released hundreds of times more radiation into the environment than the Three Mile Island meltdown did 20 years later.


“This confirms what we were worried about,” said Assemblywoman Julia Brownley, D-Oak Park, a longtime leader in the fight to clean up the 2,850-acre Santa Susana Field Laboratory (SSFL) 30 miles northwest of downtown Los Angeles. “This begins to answer critical questions about what’s still up there, where, how much, and how bad?”


Brownley expressed disappointment that the site had been supposedly cleaned up twice before by lab owner Boeing and the Department of Energy, which controls Area IV where all of Rocketdyne’s nuclear work was conducted. Partial meltdowns occurred there in at least two other reactors in 1964 and 1969.


“Data show exceedance levels ran as high as 1,000 times the ‘radiation trigger levels’ (RTLs) agreed to by the Department of Energy and the California Department of Toxic Substances Control in a historic cleanup agreement signed in December 2010,” Brownley said, referring to agreements on consent with the DOE and NASA to clean up Rocketdyne to background levels of radiological and chemical contamination. “I call again on the Department of Energy to comply with the agreement that it signed, fully and unconditionally.”


That may be easier said than done. This latest U.S. EPA information appears to redefine what cleaning up to background actually is. Publicly available documents show that the levels of radiation in this part of Area IV where the SRE once stood are actually many thousands of times more contaminated than previously thought.


Just as troubling, the EPA’s RTLs, which are supposed to mirror the extensively tested and reported-on backgrounds of the numerous radionuclides at the site, were many times over the background threshold values (BTVs). So instead of cleaning up to background, much more radiation would be left in the ground, saving the government and lab owner Boeing millions in cleanup.


It is a classic bait and switch. And it almost worked.


It went unnoticed until this reporter spotted the huge discrepancy between the RTLs and BTVs because they were so obvious to anyone with any SSFL knowledge. Yet nobody else had noticed except, obviously, the EPA that created the PowerPoint with the bait-and-switched numbers in the first place.


One soil sample was laced with cesium-137 clocking in at 9,328 times its background, as shown in a July 2011 U.S. EPA Radiological Background Study Report for Rocketdyne in Table 8.4. Yet the EPA’s RTL in the PowerPoint is more than 25 times the same agency’s 2011 background study for subsurface samples of Cs-137, a cancer-causing radionuclide.


On a scenic bluff overlooking Simi Valley next to where the SRE once stood, leukemia-causing strontium-90 was assigned an RTL 6.47 times Sr-90’s BTV and tested at 284 times background.


Strontium-90’s RTL was more than 37 times its BTV in another sample. The hot dirt came in at more than 71 times background radiation, dug out a couple of feet below the surface. This suggests that even after two “cleanups” the area may still be facing a huge excavation job.


Fuzzy math also made its mark on the RTLs of tritium, carbon-14, cobalt-60, neptunium-239 and europa-152. All were detected by EPA at several multiples of their actual backgrounds.


Nothing could be more worrisome than the manipulation of the levels determined for plutonium-239/240. The isotope is one of the most potent radioactive killers on the planet, yet the EPA’s radiological trigger level was nearly 20 times its background. Exposure to even minute amounts of Pu-239/240 can give a person lung cancer.


Misleading and factually incorrect numbers not only reduce the radiation readings of overages at Rocketdyne, their use could lead to leaving large amounts of radiation in place once the cleanup, which has cost hundreds of millions, ends as soon as 2017.


An EPA official told the Reporter in a March 10 e-mail that he would look into the issue.


The agreements on consent, or AOCs, with DOE and NASA explicitly say that contaminated soils must be removed, not left in place or buried. Yet with these huge radiation readings and markedly lower cleanup standards that violate the agreements, the hot zone that is Rocketdyne just got a whole lot hotter.  

DIGG | del.icio.us | REDDIT

Other Stories by Michael Collins

Related Articles

Comments

Once again Mr Collins has shown us that "the truth is out there" it is very sad that we cannot depend on these agencies to present the facts.
Bravo Michael and thank you for a great piece that is easy for a lay person to understand.

Reverend John Southwick

posted by revmate on 3/21/12 @ 07:29 p.m.

Another reason why we need other eyes looking at these reports, thanks Michael for pointing this out. Now we know, now we should encourage the responsible parties to do the right thing and look forward to a proper cleanup with source removal as an only option.

William Preston Bowling
Founder ACME
Aerospace Contamination Museum of Education
http://www.acmela.org/

posted by ACME on 3/21/12 @ 10:31 p.m.

An EPA official will "look into it"? What does that mean??? Maybe they should have looked into it before blowing millions of our dollars. I hope VC Reporter stays on this. I want to know how this happened. Brownley should start an investigation before its too late.

posted by Rebekah W. on 3/21/12 @ 11:31 p.m.

I live in Box Canyon, in the most beautiful setting nestled in the Santa Susana Mountains. All I want is the view, the rocks, the seclusion. Who cares about a little radioisotopes, they're supposed to be good for you any hoot as the SSMPA has always said.

Let's just make it all a big party park, light one up and forget about it. I'll be dead in 20, so what is all the fuss and bother about?

posted by john l on 3/23/12 @ 03:00 a.m.

Thank you Michael for putting out the truth for all to see

posted by M.Mason on 3/23/12 @ 09:39 p.m.

Thank you for calling this to our attention. Hopefully this will be the push they need to clean this mess up (if it's even possible).

posted by pjcyrus on 3/25/12 @ 01:20 p.m.

Luker from Box Canyon teams up with Andre Van der Valk to place State Park Visitor Center right smack in the middle of Lead and Arsenic Plume at Chatsworth Park South. Is this not the same Van der Valk who is part of the group that pressured the City of LA to buy the hazardous waste site known back then as Aqua Sierra Sportsman's Club (aka Chatsworth Park South trap and skeet shooting range) in the first place? <<Short Answer -- yes, it's called Chatsworth Historical Society>> And isn't Luker in denial about all the contamination the brand-spanking-new visitor's center currently sits on? And isn't Luker in denial about all the surface water and groundwater that runs down or under the contaminated creek next to the new trailer? And isn't Luker in denial regarding Train Tunnel 26 contaminated outflows and seasonal rains adding to the CPS lead and arsenic plume 24/7/365? And isn't Luker responsible for the closing of nearby Sage Ranch Park due to his reporting of the shooting range lead, arsenic, PAH, and dioxin contamination issue at THAT site? But now Luker is in denial regarding a much greater shooting range contamination problem located down the hill at Chatsworth Park South?

Serves them right: the City's CPS park is closed, their visitor center is closed, their minds are closed, and their rants are now closed off from the community's ears...

Anyone submit a fraud, waste, and abuse complaint to the state Inspector General yet? Please do.

posted by Sol Weiss on 3/28/12 @ 09:31 p.m.

good on ya, Michael,

as we say down under.

for this article, and "Atomic Avenger", and "Boeing Blocks Lab Cleanup", and "Cleaning up Rocketdyne"!

looking for more, and deeper, broader, articles from you on the subject of the California nuclear aerospace monster (the horror, the truth, a thousand times greater than this article touches on).

but perhaps, hopefully, you have already realized that this story was 'created' (set up) for you, and actually is whole red herring $ecurity-$tate disinfo to engage you and the county in covering up that thousand times greater story.

if you are on facebook look me up, and let us know when you have the new, and real, story to tell.
meanwhile I will share this article of yours there.

singing the ending of the Genocidal Mob$ter,
the returning of all our relations,
the lives of Todas las Cosas,
our Mother Earth,

Millennium Twain

posted by Millennium on 4/15/12 @ 08:07 p.m.
posted by Millennium on 4/16/12 @ 08:52 p.m.
Post A Comment

Requires free registration.

(Forgotten your password?")