Multilevel marketing: Brand new names, same old games
What may be the golden ticket for some turns into a nightmare for others
By Joan Trossman Bien 07/09/2009
“Very sad.”
“One of the low points in my life.”
“A horrible thing.”
“About 800 people are selling under me.”
These comments are from various people who have been involved in some aspect of multilevel marketing. Some felt they were victims, one is an active distributor, and one is in law enforcement. You may think that the era of pyramid schemes, Ponzi schemes and chain letters died with the disco days. After all, it was a popular idea in the 1970s that turned sour for many people. Some companies were prosecuted by various government agencies, and multilevel marketing got a bad rep.
But multilevel marketing is still very much alive — take, for instance, Bernie Madoff, who made off with billions of dollars in the grandest Ponzi scheme of all time. However, new buzz words now punctuate the sales rap, such as “networking,” “direct marketing,” “affiliate marketing,” “matrix marketing,” “home-based business franchising” or simply “the opportunity of a lifetime to build your own business and live the American dream.” It can be very tempting — and for some, the temptation pays off.
So how can you tell the difference between a legitimate business opportunity and a multilevel marketing scheme, even those that have remained legal for many years but still bear the hallmarks of a pyramid plan?
There oughta be a law
Gregory Brose is the Ventura County chief deputy district attorney for special prosecutions and said there are some red flags. “The key is,” Brose said, “are you getting most of your money from signing up new participants? Because if that is the case, eventually it is doomed to failure because you are going to run out of new participants.” Another warning sign is if you are told that you must sign up immediately or the offer will expire. Trust your instincts, Brose said, and take your time to investigate the company before joining any group.
“On the other hand,” Brose said, “if they really have a viable, valuable service or product that people are selling and it is the predominant way they are getting their income, then it could be a lawful enterprise.”
There are two laws on the books that address multilevel marketing. The first is criminal, California Penal Code section 327. In essence, it says that anyone who participates in an “endless chain” is guilty of a misdemeanor or felony punishable “by imprisonment in state prison for up to three years.” The crime is defined as a scheme where one pays for the chance to be compensated by bringing other people into the plan.
Another statute is California Civil Code section 1812.200, et seq. It deals with the seller assisted marketing plan or SAMP, and is designed to protect consumers from fraudulent business opportunity plans. “It covers the situation where the person providing this business plan opportunity offers to provide guidance or training or equipment, set them up in business, and then make sure they are going to have this massive income stream, if they take the right steps,” Brose said.
Brose said he was involved in prosecuting a case in Riverside County back in the 1970s. It involved raising rabbits for their fur, which was allegedly in great demand with a Paris designer. “They were going to make rabbit fur coats, and you were going to make a ton of money,” Brose said. “The rabbits were going to give up their lives for the coats.”
Of course, the extreme summer heat in the area killed a lot of the rabbits. So owners had the added expense of providing air conditioned indoor digs. Then, the worst part — “You were going to have to be a rabbit butcher and provide the skins,” Brose said. “It was pretty nasty.” He added that there was no designer in Paris who wanted to purchase the skins. “It was very sad.”
Brose advised that you ask yourself some basic questions. If this product is so great, why do I have to pay a fee for the privilege of purchasing it? Why isn’t it just sold like everything else? And why is the person selling the product saying they would like to bring me into the organization? Don’t they have enough sales people already? Won’t the market become saturated and then collapse?
Here are some personal stories from the front lines of multilevel marketing.
He was hot, she’s been got
Kelly (not her real name due to personal embarrassment) is 48 years old and lives in Westlake Village. Kelly said she dabbled in multilevel marketing back in the early 1990s, when she was much younger and eager to impress others. At that time, Kelly was working in a law office and was pursuing a career in real estate. “I was making a good living and was not desperate at all,” she said. “That was one of the pretexts used for finding people to go into this plan — find successful people. That’s how it was marketed to me.”
Kelly was selected by her sponsor in an unusual way. She said she met him when he followed her as she drove down the freeway many miles to the Beverly Hills area. He was in a very hot car, she said, and she was looking her best as she was heading to a party at the Beverly Hills Hotel. She pulled into a gas station, they traded business cards. He was in the industry that she wanted to break into, and they began to date.
A year later, Kelly said, he brought up the marketing plan while they were in bed. Kelly was open to the idea because, “I thought this would be a good way to impress him. I really thought I could do this.”
The plan involved selling water and air filtration systems. Kelly said it seemed to be a winner. “This is a great opportunity, the product is superior,” Kelly said. “Your market is anybody who breathes air and drinks water.” She said, “I thought, hey, I know a lot of people who breathe air and drink water.”
The first bright, flashing red light was that Kelly needed to buy product and lots of it. But Kelly was convinced that she could do it and succeed. She said she was not discouraged when she was unable to sell the products because she believed that she could recruit other successful people in her life to sign up as distributors. After all, this guy was so motivated and positive and charming.
“When I tried to recruit other people, I had to cloak it in the form of inviting them to a corporate briefing,” Kelly said. She convinced a couple of high-powered attorneys from her office to accompany her to a meeting. “When the meeting began, they started mocking it, and I knew that I had made a fool of myself. It hurt my credibility in my real world but in my network marketing world, my sponsor was loving it. When I look back on it, it was just a big hoax.”
For Kelly, the entire episode became very personal. Her sponsor was a player. “I found out about the other women involved in it by knocks on the door and phone calls in the middle of the night,” Kelly said. “And they found out about me, so, all of a sudden, there were girl fights.”
“I not only felt used, but I felt like I used other people,” Kelly said. “It is a terrible thing. And I couldn’t sell the products so I told my sponsor that I was going to back out. I said that I had $5,000 worth of product and asked what he was going to do about it.” To Kelly’s relief, he bought it back from her.
“It seemed like a good thing,” Kelly said. “You know, water, air.”
Tossing common sense to the wind
Bob (not his real name due to pending litigation) is a man who had lived a conservative life in an arid region of California, owned his house outright, and a retired teacher. He admits that he did not use his best judgment or his superior math skills when he walked straight into a financial services multilevel marketing scheme.
Bob said the guy selling the services had a great opening presentation. “He said, ‘How can the money in the wood of your walls earn you any money?’ ” Bob recalled. “ ‘You gotta take it out of there, and make something happen with the money.’ ”
Bob said he was told to invest all of his money from the equity in his homes in what is called a variable universal life policy (VUL) at 12 percent for 10 years -- which is/was illegal though his "financial adviser" kept that tidbit of information to himself. He was then told that if he did that, he would be able to withdraw an income of $44,000 a year for 20 years. So Bob refinanced his home and took out $250,000. Bob was not doing his homework.
“He said I should use a power option ARM (adjustable rate mortgage), which would reset in three years to a conventional mortgage,” Bob said. “I was told to use the minimum interest option, which would mean negative amortization, which is when you owe more each month instead of chipping away at the principal.”
It gets even more complicated. “He was emphasizing the $44,000 each year and said because it was from a life insurance policy, it would be interest-free and tax-free,” Bob said. However, Bob did not consult with an attorney or an accountant or do any of the due diligence that is what professionals would recommend.
Although this deceptive financial arrangement is a bad idea, it got even worse, and Bob jumped in with both feet. “I was supposed to then sell this policy to someone else,” Bob said. “It was all based on friends and neighbors, and you were supposed to sign them up to do the same thing. It is all silver-tongued devil stuff.”
In the end, Bob has recouped his initial losses of well over $100,000. But litigation is ongoing against this group called World Financial Group. It has a checkered past with many fines over the years. Bob just did not investigate the group.
“It was too good to be true,” Bob said. “I feel embarrassed. I feel very bad about having gone to other people I know to get them involved. It’s absolutely a horrible thing.”
Raking in the dough from the top
With these stories about multilevel marketing, you may wonder where all the money goes. It goes to the top, the original people who joined the organization when it was just beginning. Some multilevel marketing companies have remained in business for decades. Are they legal? Yes. Are they pulling money from one person to shower it on another? Yes. Although Amway may come to mind, there is an even more established company that has been doing this for a very long time.
It is Shaklee Products.
Meet Margie Arendts of Thousand Oaks. Margie is a 72-year-old retired elementary school teacher, and her husband is a retired airline pilot. Arendts became a Shaklee Products distributor some 40 years ago.
Arendts became involved with Shaklee because she really liked their products. Now, it is about the multilevel part of the marketing. “Most of my income from Shaklee is from other people who are selling,” Arendts said. “I am still very active in recruiting other people to sell.”
So what will 40 years of plugging away in the same company get you? “I’m probably not exaggerating when I say about 800 people are selling under me,” Arendts said. “Forty years is a long time.”
Arendts eschews the hard sell for the softer side of recruitment. “Our approach is, these are the products we have available; if you are interested, fine,” Arendts said. “If not, you’re still going to be my friend. We keep it very low key because we want them to be comfortable with what they’re doing.”
To purchase Shaklee products, you must pay an upfront fee of $19.95 just to get the catalog. There are then two levels to become a distributor. The lower one costs $39.95, and the one with the bells and whistles costs $300. Of course, then there are all of the supplemental educational guides and meetings to motivate the ever-growing number of distributors. “Not everybody wants to become a member,” Arendts said. “And not everybody wants to build a business. So it’s a numbers game.”
Multilevel marketing has staying power because of its promise that by just following the company’s roadmap for success, you, too, can enjoy the luxuries reserved for only the wealthy. But remember, it is a game of numbers, and market saturation is a very real thing, especially during an economic downturn. And only a few can win at this game.
DIGG | del.icio.us | REDDIT
Other Stories by Joan Trossman Bien
Related Articles
Comments
Thank you for allowing me to comment on your article.
It might help to clarify the comments by knowing that Networkmarketing is a method of distribution of products, not an industry in itself.
Warren Buffet owns Pampered Chef (an MLM).
Donald Trump owns a a nutrition company (MLM).
Robert Kiyosaki and many other respected financial guru's recommend Network marketing as a great way to supplement a family income.
Let me say ahead of time, I am a Shaklee Distributor.
I was a customer for 29 years before I decided to actually distribute the products and now make a 6 figure income annually by inviting others to use the products and sharing the same opportunity that I was given and so grateful for.
Let me explain the membership options so you will understand the value received.
the $19.95 Members fee is very similiar to joining Costco and Sam's Club.
In exchange for the fee, you not only receive materials, but an online store at which you may purchase all products at a 15% discount ( saving many of my members a significant amount each year.
The $39.95 membership included business building tools and training and a coupon for a free product worth up to $85.00. I hope anyone can see that value.
But for those who wish to build a business, we have a "business in a box" filled with products , tools, and the basics of beginning a home based business.
I have never encouraged anyone to buy a product or package that did not benefit them. Our companies 1st rule for 52 years has been "The Golden Rule".
Ponzi Schemes are illegal. Network Marketing is a highly successful way of bringing products to the market, particularly those that might require personal contact and instruction or advice.
Putting a solid reputable company in the same sentence with Berni Maddof is like comparing your paper to all the rags and gossip trash that is available.
Finally, May I ask you a question? What is the shape of your newspaper company? Is there an Owner, than a Board, then a general manager, then department heads, then employees, etc.?
HMMMMM. Sounds like a pyramid to me.
I read this article earlier but decided to wait to reply. When I read stuff like this I know it comes from someone who hasn't done the proper research on the subject so it irritates me and it's best not to write a response when irritated.
Kathi, you are spot on. Using the Madoff Ponzi scheme and somehow trying to tie it to network marketing is an absolute joke. What Madoff did was ruin thousands of lives by taking from them billions of dollars. To date I haven't seen this happen in network marketing. There are thousands of companies that utilize network(word of mouth)marketing very successfully as a distribution channel. You touched on a couple but AT&T, Verizon, and a host of other huge companies utilize network marketing for new customers. Your company, Shaklee has had remarkable staying power with this business model and has helped thousands of people over the years enjoy additional income. I'm not with Shaklee but I know of several people who are and have enjoyed immense success with Shaklee. And I also know of other people from other companies that have become millionaires through network marketing.
Joan, your last comment re: "it's a numbers game, "market saturation", "few can win", etc. again comes from someone who has not researched the industry. Also, if you did the research you would have found that companies like Avon and Mary Kay are posting record numbers of new distributors. Why? Because of the "economic downturn".
Network Marketing is not a "pyramid scheme" or a "Ponzi scheme" but a legitimate way for a company to distribute it's products and services through a very efficient, and the most powerful, marketing system known to business-word of mouth.
Tony Estigoy
I don't know of any ponzi schemes or illegal pyramid schemes where their founder has made Ernst and Young's Entrepreneur of the Year. Do you? Please excuse the author of this VC Reporter article for they know not of what they write. Tony & Kathi have a better understanding of what this author claims to have knowledge of. Perhaps they are in a better position to to take on this type of assignment. See below:
Dallin A. Larsen Named Ernst & Young Entrepreneur Of The Year
An ecstatic crowd of nearly 1,200 guests raised their glasses to honor MonaVie Founder, Chairman, and CEO Dallin A. Larsen as Ernst & Young Entrepreneur Of The Year® in the distribution and manufacturing category, Friday June 12, 2009. The black tie event held at the Salt Palace Convention Center , in Salt Lake City , honored visionaries in the Utah region who have committed their lives to pursuing new ideas.
“We are proud to recognize the achievements of Dallin A. Larsen,” says David Jolley, Ernst & Young LLP Entrepreneur Of The Year Program Director for the Utah Region. “Award recipients of the Entrepreneur Of The Year award build leading businesses and contribute significantly to the strength of our region’s economy. Their success helps our area grow stronger.”
Encircled by MonaVie Cofounders Henry Marsh and Randy Larsen, distributor leaders, employees and friends, Dallin graciously accepted the crystal Ernst & Young Entrepreneur Of The Year® Award.
Ernst & Young’s Entrepreneur Of The Year® Award is the world’s most prestigious business award for entrepreneurs. The program celebrates those who are building and leading successful, growing and dynamic businesses.
B.T.W., MonaVie is a functional beverage company that utilizes network marketing to promote it's products.
Jacques Comet
The Monavie Scam...
true or false, you discern
http://www.onlinescamsuncovered.com/mona...
Amazing. Clearly, that post from Michaels is an advertisement dressed up as some sort of study but in actuality, is a promotion for their particular product. Anyone with an ounce of discernment will see and understand that. It is unfortunate that there are those who will stoop this low in order to promote their product, thus continuing to give Network Marketing a bad stigma. I personally have never resorted to this method and will just say that I honestly wish him well. I'm sure that the "Law of Attraction" will apply and that he will surround himself with those of similar mindset. My immediate reaction would normally be to defend MonaVie but in this case, I'll just let my first post speak for itself because I truly believe in the discernment of this audience.
Jacques Comet
OK, Jacques.
Then just google "Monavie scam" and see the endless sites discussing the validity of Monavie, good and bad. I am not here to represent any product, I just know there are two sides to every story.
OK, Michaels.
The hyperlink in your first post was promoting a product. Go ahead and Google any product with scam behind it and you will find the negative criticism flowing readily, including the product mentioned in your hyperlink. The word "scam" does have a negative stigma associated to it. I, on the other hand choose to be more positive. If I run across a product that doesn't work for me, I just don't use it. It doesn't mean that the product doesn't work, and I do not try to influence others by offering my opinion when it wasn't even asked for. But that's just me. If I were to experience something harmful, I would bring it up with the company and the appropriate authorities. There are thousands of great products that are distributed by MLM and if you choose not to use a product because of the way it is marketed, that is your choice. When I run across a product that I can get excited about, I cannot help but share. Everyone does some form of relationship marketing. It is just a select few that get paid to do it. Not by the people that use the products but by the companies that promote them. B.T.W., The company I had mentioned in my first post pays their distributors for the volume of sales moving through their business center, not on how many people they sign up. They offer an incredible product (in my opinion) and that is why they have been so successful (I guess that I'm not alone in my thinking, here). They have the science to back up their claims and the independent double blind placebo tests don't lie. After all, it's just fruit in a bottle. Really exotic and wild fruit, but nevertheless, just fruit. They make no claims as to the efficacy of their product or claim that it does anything but enable us to get the amount of fruit that our government says we need to be healthy. Why do you feel the need to influence others to take your same pessimistic views? So, if you were to do a real and honest self evaluation, what was your purpose in your first post or second, for that matter? In my opinion, your motive is at best, questionable. You indicate that you aren't representing or promoting any product but you're OK with promoting pessimism? So now you get to read a little about my side (one of the two that you mention), where I think that I'll stay because quite frankly, your side isn't that attractive (at least to me, anyhow). I hope all works well for you.
Jacques Comet
Kathi,, Toni and Jacques Comet are spot on.
Any and all product’s with the word … scam behind it you will find the negative criticism flowing readily. Can’t believe people are so worried about MLM scam’s when there is much more serious stuff going on as we speak. I believe in the MLM system it works. Granted there are companies out there taking advantage of people or people taking advantage of people. That’s live and one has to stop marketing himself or herself as a victim. Rather do the research into the company as well as into their products. Shaklee has it all. The finest products and the top business model. Many companies fallow Shaklee and there top business model. Since they are the pioneers in the MLM. I did the research and found everything in live is some kind of MLM. Just look @ the politics.
How any politician utilizes MLM. Mr. Obama is in the top ranks. Besides Jesus who was the first MLM er he started out with 12 Apostles.
America is in crises and we need free enterprise, we must keep it alive and well.
America is about to take a step toward socialism
The bailout is a redistribution of the wealth. They are taking money from the middle and lower class and giving it to the wealthy. Redistribution of wealth is the whole idea of Socialism; except in socialism it is supposed to come from the rich and go to the poor.
HMMMMM. Sounds like a pyramid to me.
After taking all this into consideration it is hard to believe we live in a democracy anymore, and even if it is one it doesn't look like were going to have freedom for too much longer.
Please support MLM the honest companies and let freedom ring. That’s the America I come to love and live in, not a socialistic US.
Thanks
@ author. With all due respect your journalism skills sorely need improvement. It is clear you did not conduct your due diligence in regards to your multi-level marketing allegations against World Financial Group.
First, I agree it is unfortunate retiree Bob was inappropriately advised with a financial product that was not suitable for his specific needs and risk tolerance. However, to claim his experience with one agent/office is representative of an entire global Fortune 100 (per Forbes magazine) financial enterprise is grossly inaccurate and a terribly fallacy. When you make a broad sweeping assumption from a few people and claim their experiences can and/or should reflect the majority, you are not conducting any significant research!
Second, World Financial Group is affiliated with one of the world industry leaders, AEGON. The financial services industry is highly regulated and while not perfected, examining the number of filed complaints provides a good indicator about the quality of the company. Case in point, World Financial Group has a securities division known as World Group Securities. Now you can research the number of lawsuits/complaints at the FINRA website. Who is FINRA? http://www.finra.org/Investors/ToolsCalc...
Read more here: http://www.finra.org/Investors/ToolsCalc...
As of today, August 3, 2009 World Group Securities has six regulatory events and two in arbitration. Now search for arguably the industry leader Goldman Sachs; the results are staggering: 168 regulatory events, two civil events and 36 arbitration! The number of complaints is staggering.
Ms. Bien, if you conducted more factual research instead of relying on a few testimonials and sensationalizing them, you would arrive at the one conclusion: World Financial Group is NOT a multi-level marketing scam. If anything the investigations by FINRA into other industry financial giants must be closely examined in comparison to its peers. These examinations provide essential insights to the complex world of financial services and the actual performance of good firms like World Financial Group/World Group Securities. In the future you owe it to yourself and your readers to conduct factually accurate investigative journalism. Thank you.
I was an associate of WFG. The business model was "recruits, recruits, recruits". To form a downline, downline, downline. I was never taught how to sell anything other than Variable Universal Life insurance policies. That is why my licensing was limited to becoming a 6 and 63 registered representative with California Life licensing. Just sell VULs.
The next step was to liquefy a client's home equity into the securities of the sub-accounts of the VULs. The pitch was not to think of the VULs as insurance... but as tax-free retirement accounts or tax-free college funds. Next I discovered the upline on the premium commissions... there were 15 living off the milk of the premiums!
Then I discovered that, “under no circumstances should a VUL be funded with a home equity loan”. The liquefication of home equity into only VULs was the pitch... the only pitch... that you were to sell to your friends and neighbors... then to their friends and neighbors. Keep creating downline for the upline.
How many variable interest loans were made in-house? All of them. More commissions.
Disgusted I quit.
Ms. Bien should be praised for opening up the multi-nation (Canada, too) sore created by WFG/WGS and Aegon International who should have policed their reps but chose to drink the milk of liquefied home equity.
Since the business model was liquefy home equity into the stock market... and both are the the toilet... the reps have to go back to a J-O-B to make ends meet.
The portion of the article about Bob is disturbing. The main grief comes from the Bob getting himself into a loan that at the time looked attractive, but since the real estate market has faltered, no longer is that way. I am sure he was sold on the products low payments, along with the expectation that property values would continue to rise. While this may be accurate and appealing to an investor, that fact is too many people which it was their primary home got into these loans.
As with any investment, real estate included, there is no guarantee of return. While historically the average return in the stock market is between 8-12 during any 10 year period, it is once again not guaranteed.
Bob purchased a VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE policy and which from the title alone makes it appear to be life insurance. Variable obviously means it will fluctuate. Now, while I do empathize with the gentleman, I do not see how the company is to blame for the situation. We are all in tough economic times and if there is a product with guaranteed returns and no loss, I would like to see it.
Sorry Bob, but I dont see your arguement.